Editor: Jaap Horst
Ettore’s Baby BugattiBy Marshall Buck I can’t believe that the answer has been in front of me all these years. The answer to what you ask? The answer to the question I often ask myself: How am I ever going to afford a genuine vintage Bugatti? Simple answer... buy a ‘Baby’ Bugatti; a child’s car to be precise. I’m not talking about one of those cheapy Toys R Us plastic jobs. No sir, the one I have in mind is very special... one of the authentic half scale renditions of a Type 35.
Granted there might also be a few drawbacks to owning and driving one of these. It ain’t fast, figure somewhere in the range of 10 to 12 mph, I won’t be able to license it for road use, and the biggest hurdle will be that I’ll probably have to wrestle it away from my seven year-old daughter every time I want to take “my Bugatti” out for a spin. Julius Kruta of Bugatti Automobiles SAS provided this rare factory drawing of the Baby Bugatti. In the lower right corner it reads 'type, Baby'. Note the rear axle. The battery was placed under the hood near the steering column. I’ve always been fascinated by any half pint car, especially the Bugatti. My first encounter with one in the flesh (actually it was two of them) was in 1998, at the home of the late Allan Stone. He was a well known art collector and gallery owner of note, as in “Allan Stone Gallery” which still exists on the upper East side of New York City. Mr. Stone was also a serious car enthusiast and had a few Bugattis in his garage as well. I was curating a model exhibition then, titled: “The Art of the Automotive Model” for the Stamford Museum in Stamford, Connecticut. It was a little bit of a stretch on the “model” theme to include one of these 'Baby's' in the exhibition since it really is not a model car, however; an important member on the Museum's board of Directors, Michael Graham, himself a serious collector of cars and models really wanted us to accommodate with inclusion of the 'Baby'.... so we did.
Since then I've seen several of Ettore's 'Baby' Bugs in person; all in various states of condition, ranging from barn find neglect to original with great patina, and even to over restored a-la Pebble Beach.
Homework: Baby Bugatti A note about The Bugatti Trust. Simply put, I could not have written this to the extent that I have without their help and access to information, and photos contained within their archives. They are an amazing and highly recommended resource for both enthusiasts and researchers. Housed within their facility is a phenomenal collection of information. If you happen to be a nut for historic photos as I am, then set aside a couple of days for viewing all of them, even better is that you can purchase copies.
Some of you may have noticed that I did not refer to the aforementioned 'Baby' Bugatti as anything but that. I made no reference to any Type 52 designation simply because...well...it is not. I used to think this 1/2 scale car was a Type 52, but I was wrong as is anyone else referring to them as such. Yes, I said that, and yes I know that historically everyone has called this 1/2 scale car a Type 52, however that is incorrect. The official designation per all factory records is Type 'Baby'. I am told that this enlightenment regarding the official designation has only come about within the past ten years. Allow me to explain. During the recent past, Bugatti Automobiles has opened up its vast files from Molsheim for research to historians whom are recognized as the foremost authorities in the world. This has allowed many more important pieces of information to surface, and for some corrections to now be made. ALL documentation and literature from the factory actually calls them Type 'Baby'. On the cover of the only official factory brochure for this model it is clearly and proudly labeled: TYPE "BABY" On all factory drawings and records including sales records this model is only referred to as 'Baby'. Note that on the factory drawing shown, it is clearly labeled Type 'Baby'. Nowhere is there any reference at all, as to these children’s cars being designated a Type 52.
Did the mistake then begin with the daughter of Ettore Bugatti?
The mystery deepens Regardless of an exact start date for Conway’s T-52 reference, it was most likely his writing and publication of that designation which may have been what started the ball rolling. After that, and throughout the years, other authors and journalists simply used that as reference, and perpetuated the incorrect T-52 designation without ever bothering to properly research it. (I did the same until I started digging.) That wouldn’t be the first time misinformation has been written and quoted by the populace, and I’m sure it won’t be the last. Why or how did Conway let this designation slip by? Who knows; but having corresponded with Richard Day on this, I am in full agreement with him that since Conway had such a close association with Molsheim it is more likely that the mis-designation originally came from senior staff at the factory who were less than concerned with accuracy.
And, how about this. In 1981, Griffith Borgeson published “Bugatti by Borgeson: The dynamics of mythology”, which was widely criticized by other Bugatti historians. In it Borgeson perpetuates the T52 myth, writing in a caption "Roland, in the original T52, with Lydia and L’Ebe." Criticized or not, Borgeson wrote the book after a long series of interviews with his friend, the aforementioned Roland Bugatti, for whom the car was built in the first place. Aha! Why did this very obvious error get by Roland? No one knows. Regardless of what some may think; let me make this perfectly clear, the only production child’s car manufactured by Bugatti was officially designated Type Baby – nothing else.
The Baby is a half scale rendition of the iconic Type 35, and it’s rare, but not uber rare. It is estimated that around 500 of these were produced at the Molsheim factory from 1927 to 1930. That figure combines both the SWB and LWB versions. What? Didn't know there were two different wheelbases built you say? Neither did I, but there are; more about that in a moment. It is unclear as to how many still exist, but the general consensus is that very many if not most, have not survived. There is no definitive record anywhere as to the exact number produced; and what is there is more than a little confusing. Within the factory sales records are many Babys with delivery dates showing them to be out of sequence according to their individual numbers. The highest chassis number on record is 499A which was sold by the factory in July of 1936. Certainly 499A was one of the very last as what appears to be the remaining five Babys were sold between November 1934 and July of 1936. However, we have one more out of sequence delivery for number 456 which has an even later sale date of July 1938. My head hurts now, how is yours?
Now about the wheelbase, and back to the factory brochure for a moment. On its cover it reads “for children ages 6 to 8.” That is my pigeon translation of the French text, but close enough. The first Babys built were short wheel base and what I'll call short body; perfect for an average size five-year-old such as Roland. These can be easily spotted in two ways. First, they just look proportionally correct, like a shrunken Type 35 that they are supposed to be. If you’re not sure, then count the hood louvers, 16 per side. The long wheel base cars have longer hoods/bonnets. It is thought that this later change was made to accommodate older and larger children. Aside from not quite looking like a mini T-35 you can again use the hood louvers as your guide; 21 per side. Once again, there is no definitive record of exactly how many of each SWB and LWB were built, though according to sales records it does appear that there were fewer SWB’s sold/delivered. The records are confusing as dates and individual numbers dart back and forth leading everyone to believe that you could order either the better looking SWB or the more practical LWB variant. The "A" following the last digit in the "chassis number" distinguished the LWB model. Ettore’s Baby does demonstrate the overall thinking of Bugatti, and here are its basic specifications:
Many of these 1/2 scale cars were sold to various fair grounds around the world, some located at fashionable summer resorts. At some of these resorts, children’s Baby Bugatti races were held. It is known that many of these small Bugattis ended up in locals as far away as Brazil and Argentina. Amongst factory sales records, one such sale was for twenty of these; sold to a buyer in Sao Paulo, and he paid 3,900 FF each! Another large order was from the Buenos Aires Zoo in Argentina for twenty-three of these for rental. Being that E.B. was always interested in any promotion of Bugatti: there were some races held just for these half pints at certain Bugatti specific events, some known to have taken place in Spain and France as pre-races to the official real car races.
How to buy However, if you want one just for your little prince or princess to bomb around in then you might want to consider one of the many reproductions available for a substantially lower entry fee. Like anything in this world that has some cachet or other perceived value to it, and often where someone sees an opportunity to cash in... they have done so. Though not always a bad thing; I have mixed feelings on this, and have been privy to some rather heated discussions on said subject, which can be argued on from now until the cows come home.
The Type Baby is an interesting side note in Bugatti history and a testament to the allure of the mark. Suffice it to say, that with all that is known and the quantity produced, this model was without a doubt a commercial success of the time for Bugatti. These were toys when first produced, albeit they were for the wealthy, but nonetheless they were toys for their children. That said, the Type Baby has always been considered a real Bugatti amongst collectors and marque enthusiasts. And now of course they are sought after bona-fide collector's pieces.
But then, what was the Type 52?
About Marshall Buck Marshall has authored a number of articles on models for various publications and wrote a featured model column for Vintage Motorsport magazine from 1988 to 1999. In 2007 he started hitting the keyboard again for Sports Car Market and Corvette Market magazines, and now has joined VeloceToday. Growing up in the USA and Europe, he was immersed in art and culture from childhood, his parents were collectors of fine art and antiques, which gave him his appreciation for quality and craftsmanship. From the age of eight onwards he was always building model kits. After his education, he held various positions in professional photography, then television production on various TV shows, and onto the post production management side. During all this time he was honing his model making skills while custom building model cars for himself, and for a few select customers, one of whom was an extremely well known car collector and part owner of Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. In 1982, that client convinced and funded Marshall to go into model making full time. He took time off from the model business in 1986, doing a three year stint with Miller Motorcars; and in 1989 he went back to model making full time. Since then, he and his models have garnered much publicity and praise world wide – some of which even brought him a personal visit from David Letterman. Marshall’s client list is a virtual who’s who of some of the most well known car enthusiasts around..
Original article in Velocetoday. from 2011.
|